Glass Canada

News Business intelligence Community Fabrication Processing & productivity Under the Glass
And there they were, gone…from Canada?

The Xinyi Canada website has been updated to only display a statement from the glass manufacturer expressing its disappointment at the collapse of talks with Stratford, Ont., city council and its withdrawal of its proposal to built a $400 million float glass plant there. The statement cites “misinformation and falsehoods spread by small opposition groups,” claiming “radical insinuations were made, with overt hostility demonstrated in opposition to the project’s development.” The proposal was withdrawn in part to prevent “unfounded attacks on its reputation.” The statement is vague about Xinyi’s future plans, saying “Xinyi looks forward to bringing the project back to Ontario when the investment environment is more welcoming.”

Given this is the second time Xinyi has been rebuffed by an Ontario municipality after facing spurious objections from NIMBY groups to a plan that met all provincial and municipal environmental standards – objections that Xinyi’s project manager called “prejudiced” – it seems something fundamental will have to change in Ontario’s “investment environment” before it will ever be welcoming enough for the province to produce float glass again. At present, any opposition, even from tiny, unrepresentative groups with no knowledge of the industry, is sufficient to cow councils. Under these conditions, it is hard to see how any project proposal could be approved. Xinyi’s statement reads like a final abandonment of its plans to do business in Ontario, and maybe Canada.


Print this page

Related




1 Comment » for And there they were, gone…from Canada?
  1. Pauline Richards says:

    I would love to see a glass plant in Southern Ontario. That said, it’s too bad that Xinyi has decided to paint the opposition to their plant this way instead of dealing directly with the issues. Costing out corrections to the plant design and operation to reduce water use and pollution would very likely demonstrate that it would be minimal, compared to the total cost of the plant. There didn’t seem to be any willingness on their part to engage. One person I know who was up on what was going on had this to say:
    All of Stratford’s aquifers were at risk. The project was a Ministry Zoning Order that totally bypassed public input. To factor in the loss of potable water, just do the math. Pricing of potable water applies to any municipality. Consider also the value of the water in supporting jobs, manufacturing and future growth.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*