Better together: IGMA and AAMA discuss plans to join forces

The AAMA and IGMA try out a joint event.
Patrick Flannery
July 30, 2019
By
The conference gave AAMA and IGMA members the chance to get to know each other with some fun events. Above, Eric Vanderpool of Performance Additives has a moment of deep thought on the scavenger hunt.
The conference gave AAMA and IGMA members the chance to get to know each other with some fun events. Above, Eric Vanderpool of Performance Additives has a moment of deep thought on the scavenger hunt.
Margaret Webb and Janice Yglesias, executive directors of the Insulating Glass Manufacturers Alliance and the American Architectual Manufacturers Association, respectively, opened the first day of official business at the joint AAMA/IGMA Summer Conference in Victoria, B.C., in June swith a report to membership.
Most of the discussion addressed progress and plans for the merger of the two associations, which members will vote on in July. If approved, the new merged organization will be called the Fenestration Glazing Industry Alliance.

Mike DeSoto of MI Windows and Doors in Gratz, Penn.; Mark Hutchinson of of Intigral; and Donnie Hunter of Kawneer took the podium to urge members to vote in favour of the merger. DeSoto pointed to the expanded influence on standards for residential fenestration that the merged association would have, and commented that it would be nice to only have to attend half as many meetings. Hutchinson said he’d found participation in AAMA useful even though he only makes IG because of the insight into residential building he gets. Hunter felt that commerical and residential glazing are fundamentally similar enough to co-exist in one association and that the two sides getting together was a signal of strength for the industry.

Yglesias and Webb outlined the voting procedures and urged members to read the unification prospectus available on the association websites. Pending a successful vote, the associations will begin strategic meetings in the fall to finalize details of the new organization. Part of that effort will be a new name and branding for the association, though the old names will likely be retained for use on familiar products and documents to maintain brand consistency.

Yglesias mentioned the AAMA’s upcoming National Fall Conference in Austin, Texas, Sept. 30 to Oct. 3 and GlassBuild in Atlanta Sept. 17 to 19, which both AAMA and IGMA support. She also said the first event for the merged association, provided the vote passes, would likely be the Annual Conference in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., in Feb. 2020.

Yglesias also welcomed Sam Leeke as the AAMA’s new certification coordinator, acting as members’ main point of contact for all its certification programs. Tamara Baskin has moved to become technical services coordinator, herding the cats of industry knowledge as they work on new codes and standards.

Attendees then got a dose of adrenaline from the keynote speaker, Patrick Moore. Moore, a co-founder of Greenpeace who left the organization over its opposition to plastics and now works with the Vinyl Institute, delivered a provocative talk challenging a swath of environmentalist shibboleths, including dismissal of climate change as an urgent problem.

The reality of climate change and the urgency to address it has been accepted science in Canada for some time, to the extent that governments are pushing hard for major and expensive upgrades to fenestration energy efficiency over the next decades. According to Moore, they are wasting their time. In his view, it’s doubtful whether human-caused carbon dioxide emissions have any important impact on climate at all, saying average temperature fluctuations correlate more closely with changes in solar activity. He called carbon dioxide a benefit as it stimulates plant growth. He pointed out that carbon dioxide levels were much higher in Earth’s ancient history and that tropical conditions persisted in the Arctic, but life flourished. Human emissions of carbon dioxide, Moore claimed, are only restoring to the atmosphere what living things have been taking out for eons and perhaps rescuing us from a condition where carbon dioxide levels would drop low enough to restrict plant growth. No mention of the possible negative effects of this happening far faster under human influence than the millions of years it took for the carbon dioxide to be taken out in the first place, and since the talk ran long there was not time for questions. Wildfires and extreme weather events, he said, probably have nothing to do with climate change and are not actually happening any more frequently than they always have.

The hair-raising claims did not stop there. Moore included a spirited defence of logging, describing clear-cuts as “temporary meadows” and claiming they provide a more diverse environment supporting more species. Our discomfort with them, he said, is a matter of esthetics rather than any real ecological concern. No species has ever been rendered extinct by habitat destruction from forestry, he claimed. He really got into his wheelhouse on plastics. The huge “garbage patch” of discarded plastics in the Pacific Ocean does not exist, he says. He pointed to a number of photoshopped and dishonestly represented internet postings from green activists as evidence that there is a a great deal of misinformation circulating about plastics. They are inert and harmless to wildlife, he claimed, saying animals that ingest them will simply pass them out again without harm. A celebrated meme of a bird feeding plastic shards to its chick is actually evidence of plastic’s benefit, as the shards are likely to act the same way as stones do in a bird’s gizzard. Investment in wind and solar energy sources is also overemphasized, Moore claimed, saying it is impossible to build enough of this infrastructure to meet needs. He recommends nuclear and hydroelectricity instead. Oil production and use will remain necessary for the foreseeable future, and investment in the Alberta oil sands and pipelines should proceed apace. He blamed opposition to the oilsands on lobbying from the U.S. Rockefeller Foundation.

Agree or disagree, it was hard to imagine a more conversation-provoking presentation.

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Subscription Centre

 
New Subscription
 
Already a Subscriber
 
Customer Service
 
View Digital Magazine Renew


We are using cookies to give you the best experience on our website. By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies. To find out more, read our Privacy Policy.